Jump to content

Firearms of note and ridicule


rmgill

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

1 hour ago, Stuart Galbraith said:

If you are going to end up in a fight in a phone booth, may as well bring all the tools.

I just watched a video about the battle for Tarawa Atoll, and there was a LOT of bayonet and knife fighting inside enemy bunkers.

Edited by shep854
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, shep854 said:

I just watched a video about the battle for Tarawa Atoll, and there was a LOT of bayonet and knife fighting inside enemy bunkers.

Knife & Bayonet fighting inside a bunker is silly. Throw in a liberal amount of grenades both frag and or white phosphorus. Or a satchel charge. 20 lbs of TNT would have an effect.

There was a quote, I think by USMC General Geiger, don't send a marine where you can send a bullet to do the job. I'm sure I've mangled the quote, and maybe the source.

Why send a man into a bunker when you can send an explosive or incendiary device instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bayonets are also good for controlling EPWs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/18/2024 at 10:44 AM, 17thfabn said:

Knife & Bayonet fighting inside a bunker is silly. Throw in a liberal amount of grenades both frag and or white phosphorus. Or a satchel charge. 20 lbs of TNT would have an effect.

There was a quote, I think by USMC General Geiger, don't send a marine where you can send a bullet to do the job. I'm sure I've mangled the quote, and maybe the source.

Why send a man into a bunker when you can send an explosive or incendiary device instead. 

Japanese soldiers had a nasty habit of re-occupying knocked out bunkers from tunnels--and Marines LOVE explosives, not to mention flamethrowers.  Many times, it came down to cold steel to secure the defenses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Markus Becker said:

Be prepared for some heresy by no other than Gun Jesus. 

 

 

Not really; that was the way people saw it back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, shep854 said:

Not really; that was the way people saw it back then.

Pistols were such status symbol among Yugo partisans and other resistance movements* but none have really considered pistol anything more than a status symbol or very, very occasional self protection tool (often vs wildlife in forests). If you were using pistol in combat you were either really desperate (in 1941. a lot of that happened) or in a really bad situation.

*USAF has issued order to aircrews that in case of rescue of shot down airman by locals said airman was supposed to leave personal weapon to them before being transferred back (to allied held parts of) Italy. Friend's grandfather got 1911 that way and it is still with a friend.

Edited by bojan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, bojan said:

Pistols were such status symbol among Yugo partisans and other resistance movements* but none have really considered pistol anything more than a status symbol or very, very occasional self protection tool (often vs wildlife in forests). If you were using pistol in combat you were either really desperate (in 1941. a lot of that happened) or in a really bad situation.

*USAF has issued order to aircrews that in case of rescue of shot down airman by locals said airman was supposed to leave personal weapon to them before being transferred back (to allied held parts of) Italy. Friend's grandfather got 1911 that way and it is still with a friend.

I've seen it noted that in Iraq, the only soldiers the locals were really scared of were the ones wearing pistols.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 17thfabn said:

Is that one of those deadly .22 LR zip assault rifles? 

My guess is they were pipe shotguns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

US Marine with a Springfield M1903A1 sniper rifle and Unertl 8x scope, Korea 1951;

US Marine with a Springfield M1903A1 sniper rifle and Unertl 8x scope, Korea 1951.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, shep854 said:

I noticed he dropped it onto the shooting mat.  That in itself makes me question the mount's ruggedness.

Question: What would happen to a WW2/Korean War/Vietnam War era optic if the rifle had been dropped from two yards? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Markus Becker said:

Question: What would happen to a WW2/Korean War/Vietnam War era optic if the rifle had been dropped from two yards? 

Obviously, it would probably be damaged.  :)

But, we're not talking about those delicate, fragile, far less capable units.

Edited by shep854
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tim Sielbeck said:

 

A fully semi-automatic flintmatchlock!

A good video, Forgotten Weapons going back to its roots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, shep854 said:

Obviously, it would probably be damaged.  :)

But, we're not talking about those delicate, fragile, far less capable units.

We are having first world problems. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Markus Becker said:

We are having first world problems. 

You use the best you can get, whatever 'best' happens to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/2/2024 at 2:48 AM, shep854 said:

A fully semi-automatic flintmatchlock!

A good video, Forgotten Weapons going back to its roots.

He followed it up with something similarly weird.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...