Jump to content

Firearms of note and ridicule


rmgill

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Markus Becker said:

This is going to be... good enough. 😉

 

Branson is a treasure!  Solid information, regardless of who it helps or hinders!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

12 hours ago, shep854 said:

Branson is a treasure!  Solid information, regardless of who it helps or hinders!

Ahh. He was Oleg’s attorney for the Fracas over The High Road. He stayed at my house on their trip down to Statesville, Ga for the hearing. I wondered what he’d been up to after taking down his legal shingle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rmgill said:

Ahh. He was Oleg’s attorney for the Fracas over The High Road. He stayed at my house on their trip down to Statesville, Ga for the hearing. I wondered what he’d been up to after taking down his legal shingle. 

The guy gets around.  That's quite a shift from lawyer to optics expert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Markus Becker said:

He said Jehova! Again! :D

 

 

1266656_original.png

:D

Thing is, what he or anyone else calls something does not make it only term, or even correct one to be called.

I prefer designations by most basic principle of operation - repeating, semi-automatic and automatic. Everything else tends to lead to cherrypicking cases to defend your side. So you either take French calling FAMAS "assault rifle" as proof, or you look at Austrians and Swiss who called  what Ian calls "battle rifles" "assault rifle".

 

 

Edited by bojan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we really going to use or cite HK’s marketing department?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FN thinks the same. So does Steyr.

Ian thinks different.

Why is his opinion more valid than their, or v/v?

Edited by bojan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bojan said:

FN thinks the same. So does Steyr.

Ian thinks different.

Why is his opinion more valid than their, or v/v?

Thus the Protestant Doctrine on Assault Rifles against the Doctrine of Gun Jesus on Battle Rifles was born.

Or a schism. Whatever.

Edited by sunday
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, sunday said:

Thus the Protestant Doctrine on Assault Rifles against the Doctrine of Gun Jesus on Battle Rifles was born.

Or a schism. Whatever.

Wouldn't at least FN count as Catholic? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Markus Becker said:

Wouldn't at least FN count as Catholic? 

Not sure, plenty of francmasons in that part of Belgium. I'd put my hopes in Beretta, SIG or Steyr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steyr and Beretta also considers 7.62x51mm automatic rifles "assault rifle".

European SIG is dead.

Also, if we could adopt original military terminology and... vz.58 would be "SMG" (Samopal) since Czech call  so any automatic weapons that is not a MG. So both vz.61 Skorpion and 7.62x51mm version of BREN-2 automatic rifle are "SMGs" :D

Soviets/Russians have pretty well defined terminology that covers well their small arms. But issues start when you try to apply it to someone else weapons. Hence M16 is "автоматическая винтовка" - automatic rifle. M4 is however "автомат", which is another designation for "automatic carbine". Carbine is defined as having "barrel length of 500mm or shorter"...

Even local terminology that defines rifles by their basic system of operation (repeating/semi-auto/automatic) has it's kinks, as it uses a role to define what is a LMG/SAW (puškomitraljez -  literal translation of French "Fusil-mitrailleur"). So RPK, PKM, MG42, MG08/15 or any other MG are same category, as long as they are used from bipod, as they are used as squad MG.

 

Adding additional civilian, US-centric terms to that hot mess... I really see no point in that. Especially as ill defined terms as "battle rifle".

 

PS. As much as Ian is great source on mechanical part of firearms he mostly knows next to nothing about how those firearms are actually used in combat. Especially things other than rifles*. And as any civilian w/o any military experience does, he gives way to much importance to the rifle** compared to all other weapons, since again he does not know how all those weapons are used in symbiosis.

*Look at his talk about AKs with Larry Vickers and his inability to comprehend that overall efficiency of US Army would not change one bit if they were issued bare-bones AKs, or any other rifle instead of guccied M4s.

** It is same syndrome with loads of medieval YT channels being obsessed with swords, when those were basically last ditch backup weapons. 

 

 

Edited by bojan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/13/2024 at 2:19 PM, sunday said:

USN did not use gunpods in Phantoms.

At least one F-4J carried a Vulcan gunpod, stationed on USS America during the 1968 Vietnam cruise. The pilot posing next to the gunpod is Lt. Bill Beardsley of VF-102. Beardsley later flew with the Blue Angels, during the 1971-1972 seasons.

Lt Bill Beardsley VF-102 Blue Angels F-4J (A).jpg

Lt Bill Beardsley VF-102 Blue Angels F-4J (B).jpg

Lt Bill Beardsley VF-102 Blue Angels F-4J (C).jpeg

Edited by JDAM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, JDAM said:

At least one F-4J carried a Vulcan gunpod, stationed on USS America during the 1968 Vietnam cruise. The pilot posing next to the gunpod is Lt. Bill Beardsley of VF-102. Beardsley later flew with the Blue Angels, during the 1971-1972 seasons.

(...)

Could be an outlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/11/2024 at 8:49 PM, sunday said:

Thus the Protestant Doctrine on Assault Rifles against the Doctrine of Gun Jesus on Battle Rifles was born.

Or a schism. Whatever.

So Mote it Be!

😀

How many Angels can dance on the head of a firing pin designed by John Moses Browing? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/12/2024 at 10:53 AM, shep854 said:

I don't think that there is any firearms term that is not 'flexible'.

Fixed Brownings ain't. 

d6136cb54405a47be3cb3065563dcd77.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garand Thumb and crew play around with Q's new 8.6 Blackout. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, rmgill said:

So Mote it Be!

😀

How many Angels can dance on the head of a firing pin designed by John Moses Browing? 

Angels are inmaterial, so infinite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...