bojan Posted October 18, 2012 Posted October 18, 2012 (edited) ...Not too many conventional munitions designed for cargo choppers.... Ugh, Mi-8 can carry two 500kg or four 250kg bombs w/o problem. I have seen phgotos from Afghanistan with ODAB, KMGU containers, RBK-250/500 CBUs, quad rack for 4 x 100kg, even ZB-500 napalm tank. So I don't get "drums with TNT" story.Probably transported ammo and/or fuel. Edited October 18, 2012 by bojan
shep854 Posted October 18, 2012 Posted October 18, 2012 What got him? The helo seemed too high for light AAA; there's an article in today's Wall Street Journal reporting that rebels are getting MANPADs. Videos are mentioned showing supposed missile shoot-downs, presumably this is one of those.
Max H Posted October 18, 2012 Posted October 18, 2012 It looked very intact for a missile hit - maybe a lucky hit from one of those autocannon armed technicals?
Simon Tan Posted October 18, 2012 Posted October 18, 2012 Loss of power to tail rotor, probably from a hit to the hydraulic system that also caused an internal fire that would eventually result in the catastrophic explosion. A Strela has a pretty puny warhead and the Mi-17 is a tough old bird. Likely result of a proximity detonation.
crazyinsane105 Posted October 19, 2012 Posted October 19, 2012 Looks like the rebels finally got their hands on some Kornet anti tank missiles. How many, who knows.... http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2ed_1350602440
demosthenes Posted October 19, 2012 Posted October 19, 2012 Looks like the rebels finally got their hands on some Kornet anti tank missiles. How many, who knows.... http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2ed_1350602440 That's clearly a Metis, not Kornet.
Exel Posted October 19, 2012 Posted October 19, 2012 Not fuel tanks. That was a most unpleasant end. At least they didn't have to suffer the inevitable crash. The way that bird was coming down, it wasn't going to be a soft landing...
L.V. Posted October 19, 2012 Posted October 19, 2012 Good thing that seemed to be a HEAT round and not an ant-personnel fragmentation round of any kind. If it were, that reporter wouldn't have survived. A 125 mm HEAT is an anti-personnel round of some kind as it produces a shit load of fragments. As with most shells, the vast majority of the fragments will project perpendicular to the projectile trajectory. I think that the guy kept his life by luck, sand bags and the fragmentation pattern.
Yalmuk Posted October 19, 2012 Posted October 19, 2012 ...Not too many conventional munitions designed for cargo choppers.... Ugh, Mi-8 can carry two 500kg or four 250kg bombs w/o problem. I have seen phgotos from Afghanistan with ODAB, KMGU containers, RBK-250/500 CBUs, quad rack for 4 x 100kg, even ZB-500 napalm tank. So I don't get "drums with TNT" story.Probably transported ammo and/or fuel. Here is some pictures and other footage of these "barrel bombs".http://brown-moses.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-mystery-of-syrian-barrel-bombs.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQxvOObQRvQhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEYu3L-WGds
bojan Posted October 19, 2012 Posted October 19, 2012 Some of those are rear parts of OFAB-250ShL bombs:"Chopped construction wire" is actually used in some Soviet frag bombs.- OFAB-250-270 among others.
shep854 Posted October 19, 2012 Posted October 19, 2012 (edited) Not fuel tanks. That was a most unpleasant end. At least they didn't have to suffer the inevitable crash. The way that bird was coming down, it wasn't going to be a soft landing...They might have made it to a survivable landing; it looked to me like the pilots had some control as it spiralled down. Edited October 19, 2012 by shep854
L.V. Posted October 20, 2012 Posted October 20, 2012 (edited) Here is some pictures and other footage of these "barrel bombs". CBUs? I coudln't see any. Edited October 20, 2012 by L.V.
lucklucky Posted October 20, 2012 Posted October 20, 2012 Maybe there was a barrel bomb inside it jumped and detonated?
Rod Posted October 20, 2012 Author Posted October 20, 2012 View from another angle:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AGR7R3cVZA&feature=youtu.be Looks like the rebels finally got their hands on some Kornet anti tank missiles. How many, who knows.... http://www.liveleak....=2ed_1350602440
bojan Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 Maybe there was a barrel bomb inside it jumped and detonated? Even if they made a bombs there is nothing simpler then adding two attachment points to suspend it on external mounts.
lucklucky Posted October 22, 2012 Posted October 22, 2012 Just speculating, maybe too big diameter/weight for external mounts. Some more info:http://brown-moses.blogspot.pt/2012/08/the-mystery-of-syrian-barrel-bombs.html
Jim Warford Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 (edited) A few more recent pics: a Syrian Army T-72 crew prior to FSA sniper fire and two vidcaps showing a burning T-55. In the first T-55 pic, you can see a small puff of white smoke coming out of one of the penetration holes in the side of the turret. There has been some speculation that this tank was captured by FSA forces and then set on fire for propaganda purposes...clearly there is at least one full turret penetration. I think this may be the first video that I have ever seen of smoke coming from inside a burning tank turret...through the hole in the penetrated armor. Edited October 24, 2012 by Jim Warford
crazyinsane105 Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 I did read in a statement by the FSA that most of their RPGs can't penetrate Assad's bigger tanks (most likely the upgraded T-55s and T-72s). And the Syrian military employs infantry quite well alongside their armor according to that same statement. The rebel commander said that snipers are employed to protect armor, so taking shots at armor is probably a lot riskier than shown on these propaganda videos.
Burncycle360 Posted October 26, 2012 Posted October 26, 2012 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8a0_1350964779 A fairly clear video of an encounter
Rod Posted October 28, 2012 Author Posted October 28, 2012 Not always as per this blogger with video to confirm:http://brown-moses.blogspot.com/ I did read in a statement by the FSA that most of their RPGs can't penetrate Assad's bigger tanks (most likely the upgraded T-55s and T-72s). And the Syrian military employs infantry quite well alongside their armor according to that same statement. The rebel commander said that snipers are employed to protect armor, so taking shots at armor is probably a lot riskier than shown on these propaganda videos.
Daan Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 Rebels engaging T-62 (?) with RCL:http://youtu.be/-ah43ui0LAo
Simon Tan Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 (edited) SPG-9 Kopye RCLish. It's a 73mm RCL with a rocket boosted projo. Neat little weapon. Nice keyhole shot with good rangefinding. Admittedly the target was compliant as it could be. Edited November 1, 2012 by Simon Tan
shep854 Posted November 2, 2012 Posted November 2, 2012 Might as well be a comfortable as possible while you wait your shot.The way those guys were wandering around w/o apparent thought of concealment was odd; but then, if that was a real engagement, the Syrian TC just might be eligible for a Darwin.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now