Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Nevermind, it's just beyond me why anybody would want to put a flower pot together with ATGMs on major military exhibition, and I was terrified with the possibility that they actually did it twice.. fortunately, that pic is from Partner 07.

 

Oh plant as in flower...sorry, had me confused.

 

Maybe put that thing there to emphasis camouflage...I never could get into the mindset of anybody involved in YugoImport (or their ideas of marketing, website design, promotional material...)

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Why? Think of it as PG-7M or Carl Gustaf of the ATGM world. Sure, there are newer, more effective (and much more expensive) toys, but most of times in combat you are also likely to make do with this cheap, simple thing. After all if you go head-to-head with tanks you are most likely done for regardless of your shiny toys and even with the shiny toys you would rather be firing them from flanks or such...

 

There's that Russian proverb: " 'Best' is the enemy of 'good enough' ".

Posted
Jim, what are the circumstances of this shot? Whose missiles are these? Definitely not from old Soviet Army stock...

 

Vas; good question...I don't know the circumstances. I do know that, like in Iraq, in Afghanistan, you can discover some interesting things.

Posted
Afghanistan...

 

Shot at 2009-07-23

 

When was that pic taken? Everyone in three-tone desert uniforms would make it pre-2006 right, '06 at the latest?

And who is the guy on the left? What is that uniform?

Could it be he is some Eastern European PRT and they're the ones operating the saggers?

I'd say that would have to be more likely than trying to use 25+ year old afghan ATGM's...

Posted

I think he's more likely to be instructor there to teach ANA how to use them than to actually use them - I cannot recall seeing any Coalition vehicle fit for Saggers, Czech PRT for example uses BVP-2 for base security so that's be AT-5, not AT-3... And for that matter I don not know whether they have missiles at all.

Posted
Why? Think of it as PG-7M or Carl Gustaf of the ATGM world. Sure, there are newer, more effective (and much more expensive) toys, but most of times in combat you are also likely to make do with this cheap, simple thing. After all if you go head-to-head with tanks you are most likely done for regardless of your shiny toys and even with the shiny toys you would rather be firing them from flanks or such...

 

Myes, but why do other countries field more modern ATGMs then if it is so simple? :P Also, the PLA does have newer types of ATGM in service - for instance the Red Arrow 8 - so why not mount these on the new vehicles?

Posted
I think he's more likely to be instructor there to teach ANA how to use them than to actually use them - I cannot recall seeing any Coalition vehicle fit for Saggers, Czech PRT for example uses BVP-2 for base security so that's be AT-5, not AT-3... And for that matter I don not know whether they have missiles at all.

Yes, makes sense, it could be Romanian instructor, they use both Malyutka and desert DPM...

Posted
Yes, makes sense, it could be Romanian instructor, they use both Malyutka and desert DPM...

 

Uniforms improved...I remember when the "universal" Romanian color pattern used to be that strange "brown with a hint of yellow" multi patched thing.

  • 3 years later...
Posted

Yugo versions are:

9M14M/MB1 - MCLOS, 3000m range, 400mm penetration, 1971.

9M14P/PB1 - SACLOS, 3000m range, 460mm penetration, 1979.

9M14P1/P1B1 - SACLOS, 3500m range, 520mm penetration, 1982.

9M14P2/P2B1 - SACLOS, 3500m range, 600mm penetration, improved speed, 1988.

9M14P3/P2B1 Maljutka 2T - SACLOS, 3500m range, 900mm penetration behind ERA, improved speed, improved resistance to jamming, 1992.

9M14P3F/P3B1F Maljutka 2F - same as above but with thermobaric warhead.

 

Have those variants ever entered widespread service in those years, and how common they were?

Posted

Yalmuk, are those North Koreans? If so, use of those missiles is not surprising, since they are at least a generation behind on most everything.

Posted

Yalmuk, are those North Koreans? If so, use of those missiles is not surprising, since they are at least a generation behind on most everything.

 

The site is Chinese and the insignia appear to be too.

Posted

 

Yalmuk, are those North Koreans? If so, use of those missiles is not surprising, since they are at least a generation behind on most everything.

 

The site is Chinese and the insignia appear to be too.

 

Thanks.

Guest Jason L
Posted

I'm rather surprised the thermobaric version hasn't seen more traction. It seems like a much more effective option for a guided HE round than using any of the more modern (and assumed far more expensive) Soviet/Russian missile systems to deliver what is basically just a shell.

Posted

 

Yugo versions are:

9M14M/MB1 - MCLOS, 3000m range, 400mm penetration, 1971.

9M14P/PB1 - SACLOS, 3000m range, 460mm penetration, 1979.

9M14P1/P1B1 - SACLOS, 3500m range, 520mm penetration, 1982.

9M14P2/P2B1 - SACLOS, 3500m range, 600mm penetration, improved speed, 1988.

9M14P3/P2B1 Maljutka 2T - SACLOS, 3500m range, 900mm penetration behind ERA, improved speed, improved resistance to jamming, 1992.

9M14P3F/P3B1F Maljutka 2F - same as above but with thermobaric warhead.

 

Have those variants ever entered widespread service in those years, and how common they were?

 

 

P1 was seen mounted on Gazelles and POLO M-83 BOV TD. It was also used on handfull of M-80AK that saw service during war in Bosnia.

P2, I am pretty sure it did not see service, but Slovenians offered modernization package at one moment that was pretty similar to this one.

Posted

Seriously hard to aim these things, and even electical power cables can be a hazard..

 

The poor stunted "Allah's Snackbar" at the end of the video made me laugh and laugh and laugh. It's even better than the hysterical "Snackbarring" from that video where the regional terrorist commander gets smoked while spraying unaimed fire from the belt fed. It's like some sort of sick parody, but it's real. S/F.....Ken M

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...