DesertFox Posted November 4, 2007 Posted November 4, 2007 I was watching the 1938 Robin Hood Movie and thinking about how Robin Hood's basic tactic of keeping his "army" alive is similar to George Washington's tactics. Is there a history of that type of tactic prior to the American Revolution?
Guest aevans Posted November 4, 2007 Posted November 4, 2007 I was watching the 1938 Robin Hood Movie and thinking about how Robin Hood's basic tactic of keeping his "army" alive is similar to George Washington's tactics. Is there a history of that type of tactic prior to the American Revolution? First of all, it's not a tactic, it's a strategy. Second, google "Fabius Maximus".
DesertFox Posted November 4, 2007 Author Posted November 4, 2007 First of all, it's not a tactic, it's a strategy. Second, google "Fabius Maximus". Thanks, on both accounts Tactics, Strategy, and Logistics.....
Redbeard Posted November 5, 2007 Posted November 5, 2007 17th-18th century European warfare very much was manoeuvring your armies (and placing your fortifications) to get into an advantageous position without risking your (expensive and professional) army in an all-or-nothing battle. Only with drafted armies from late 18th century making manpower less expensive and available in large numbers did "preservation of the army" become less prominent. The Habsburgs had the preservation strategy stay prominent for longer though, as in the end the army was what kept that Empire together. Regards Steffen Redbeard
DesertFox Posted November 5, 2007 Author Posted November 5, 2007 That raises the question, did George Washington use the strategy the British expected him to?
Guest aevans Posted November 5, 2007 Posted November 5, 2007 That raises the question, did George Washington use the strategy the British expected him to? I think they expected him to fight it out in the beginning. After that, I think they pretty much expected him to do what he did.
Brasidas Posted November 5, 2007 Posted November 5, 2007 I bet he expected a Saratoga to happen eventually.
KingSargent Posted November 5, 2007 Posted November 5, 2007 I bet he expected a Saratoga to happen eventually.That's what they organized and trained to achieve, proficiency in standard standup in line and duke it out tactics. The Continentals were a pretty competent European-style army by 1780. Of course they were a minority in terms of American manpower. IIRC, ca.16,582 Continentals served throughout the entire war. Where that figure came from I have no idea, maybe from pension rolls, which would ignore the dead.
Guest aevans Posted November 5, 2007 Posted November 5, 2007 Well, that's kind of the whole point for a Fabian strategy -- keep the army in the field and wait for opportunities to turn up.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now