Stefan Kotsch Posted June 7, 2023 Share Posted June 7, 2023 (edited) On 7.6.2023 at 19:19, DB said: but a mechanical cooling fan will likely be functional at idle, whereas this injection cooling just won't have enough airflow at idle It was good practice to cool a hot engine while stationary by increasing the crankshaft rotations. So that the cooler fan spins faster. Or so that the ejector draws in more cold air. In that sense, that's not an argument. @edit Do not forget. The cooling water pump also conveys more volume through the cooler when the crankshaft speed increases. Edited June 10, 2023 by Stefan Kotsch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harkonnen Posted June 9, 2023 Author Share Posted June 9, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harkonnen Posted June 9, 2023 Author Share Posted June 9, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunday Posted June 9, 2023 Share Posted June 9, 2023 1 hour ago, Harkonnen said: Very instructive. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alejandro_ Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 Some more from the same guy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiedzmin Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 (edited) some dumb claims(as all other posts from this author), but fun to read i think Edited June 10, 2023 by Wiedzmin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harkonnen Posted June 10, 2023 Author Share Posted June 10, 2023 (edited) 15 hours ago, alejandro_ said: Some more from the same guy... Yes, deep and erudite author who consulted a lot with us. This causes terrible pain for supporters of inferior copies of the T-64 such as the T-72 and T-80. Edited June 11, 2023 by Harkonnen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harkonnen Posted June 10, 2023 Author Share Posted June 10, 2023 The wonderful truthful book that this author will publish, including one based on archival data, will open the eyes of the English-speaking audience to the T-64 and the miserable crafts of incompetent thieves of competing design bureaus that destroyed the tank building of the USSR - Tagil and Leningrad. It's a pity I don't have time to translate the archival data myself in order to open the shameful lies published by the falsifiers of Russian design bureaus and transferred to English-language sources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike1158 Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 Sounds like an interesting book, I'll keep an eye out for publication. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiedzmin Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 (edited) 4 hours ago, Harkonnen said: inferior copies of the T-64 such as the T-72 and T-80. If somebody support your personal opinion or trying to repeat your so called articles, most of which you always edit "a bit" towards showing "T-64 perfection"(which most of times you fail to do because rarely understand what you writing about) it doesn't mean that it's actually a good one. Edited June 11, 2023 by Wiedzmin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harkonnen Posted June 11, 2023 Author Share Posted June 11, 2023 It is difficult to answer a person who cannot formulate his thoughts and has not written anything longer than a sentence in his life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harkonnen Posted June 11, 2023 Author Share Posted June 11, 2023 It is obvious that the Russian T-72 and T-80 are degraded copies of the T-64. At the same time, their developers worsened all the characteristics because they did not understand what they were doing. False myths were created and found their way into Western books. The fact that the T-64 was not reliable, at a time when it is more reliable than the T-72 and T-80 clones. About how expensive it is when it's cheaper than clones. And many others. The creators of these fakes did not expect that the archives revealing their lies would be declassified. But the most important thing is that Russia does not have its own tank design school - only copying. As a result, the future of thieves is not Armata, but the T-62. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunday Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 I find remarkable the influx of one-post troll accounts that get deleted immediately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harkonnen Posted June 12, 2023 Author Share Posted June 12, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiedzmin Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 (edited) On 6/11/2023 at 2:05 PM, Harkonnen said: is obvious that the Russian T-72 and T-80 are degraded copies of the T-64. Only obvious part here is that you live on your own fantasies [quote]not written anything longer than a sentence in his life.[/quote] Ah, so your theft of report's, photos, and other material's from others without showing sources is now a "your own writings" ? That's some real art historian you are Edited June 13, 2023 by Wiedzmin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harkonnen Posted June 13, 2023 Author Share Posted June 13, 2023 Please do not pay attention to the stupidity of the offended ignorant empty space that wrote above. He considers the study of the archives a theft. He is very jealous because he does not have anything exclusive and has to draw armor schemes according to my description. Sources are cited in all my materials. Unfortunately, in Russia they are still under the cover of secrecy in order to hide the dirty intrigues of the Leningrad and Tagil clan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiedzmin Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 1 hour ago, Harkonnen said: according to my description your highness, didn't the crown squeeze your skull too hard ? 😆 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ssnake Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 Am I the only one who thinks that this tit for tat debating style is a needless distraction from this thread? Let the power of the argument speak for itself and leave it to the reader to decide whom to believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETAC21 Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 32 minutes ago, Ssnake said: Am I the only one who thinks that this tit for tat debating style is a needless distraction from this thread? Let the power of the argument speak for itself and leave it to the reader to decide whom to believe. True, but what a colorful flame was it has been Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harkonnen Posted June 13, 2023 Author Share Posted June 13, 2023 (edited) 46 minutes ago, Ssnake said: Am I the only one who thinks that this tit for tat debating style is a needless distraction from this thread? Let the power of the argument speak for itself and leave it to the reader to decide whom to believe. The information is presented simply and intelligibly, confirmed by sources with test results and experience in combat use. And what we have in response is the miserable unsubstantiated phrases of a person who has not written more than a sentence in his life and is famous only for posting materials obtained by other people from the British and Bundesarchiv on the net without understanding what is written in them. Is this an argument below - Edited June 13, 2023 by Harkonnen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ssnake Posted June 13, 2023 Share Posted June 13, 2023 Repetition doesn't improve your case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB Posted June 14, 2023 Share Posted June 14, 2023 History Today YouTube clip incoming... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alejandro_ Posted June 15, 2023 Share Posted June 15, 2023 On upgraded T-64s... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Warford Posted June 15, 2023 Share Posted June 15, 2023 Speaking of the T-64 (after my own tanks back in the day), still my favorite tank...it looks like Morozov was a member of Khrushchev's anti-gun, pro-missile mafia, which put an abrupt end to the SU-122-54. For that, he's still on my sh!t list. 🙂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harkonnen Posted June 15, 2023 Author Share Posted June 15, 2023 He definitely was not missile supporter at all and resisted them at all costs. Only Tagil made missile tank IT-1, while Morozov considered it not a god idea, and he managed to abandon Object 431 missile tank as he knew it is a dead end – not main tank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now