Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'then vs now'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Discussion Forums
    • AFV Forum
    • General Naval and Air
    • Weapons other than Tanks (WOTTs)
    • King Sargent Military History Forum
    • Military Current Events
    • Armor Scientific Forum
    • Modeller's Forum
    • Gamer's Forum
    • Free Fire Zone
    • Tanknet Library
    • Hall of Remembrance
  • TankNet Features
    • Reception Station
    • The Whine Cellar
    • The Trading Post

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Website URL


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 1 result

  1. Wow; been awhile since I posted here! One of my my hobbies is roleplaying online, and in preparation for one that will be set in a post-post apocalyptic setting, I've been researching Victorian era firearms, which of course include a lot of classic, old west guns and calibers such as the .44-40 and reading up on the ballistics of it, it would seem that it has statistics at least as good as most modern pistol rounds, despite being a black powder weapon, which was surprising to me, as I thought BP was distinctively inferior to smokeless powder, let alone the evolved varieties of it we have today. With this in mind, what real advantages are 140+ years of handgun and propellant research really giving me? I'm looking this only from an ammunition perspective, not a platform one. In terms of terminal effects on the target, is there really any advantage of say a 10mm Super Redhawk firing Speer Gold Dot rounds over an 1870s Smith and Wesson Model 3 chambered in .44-40?
×
×
  • Create New...