superfractal

tell me about it! my dad informed me last week that i am no longer invited to dinner christmas day. so i had to rush to arrange a christmas dinner at mine. With my brother who was also uninvited! and a couple of my friends, one of which's family decided to go on holiday and not invite him, the other just plain cant stand his parents. I would of said the more the merrier but your a bit far away and we dont know each other that well. anyway i will be cooking pork roast (2 joints!), with goose fat roasted potatoes, peas, mushrooms, onions, stuffing and yorkshire puddings. i guess it will be a traditional english roast.

That was through the lower hull though, which is much weaker than the upper hull. Im not saying an rpg-29 could not penetrate the upper hull, but that particular occasion i belive it was the lower hull.

no no it was a 120mm hesh round not a heat round, it was a typo on my part. I was actualy basing that on a book i have read and It was in responce to the opinion that an ifv cannot be protected frontaly against 30mm auto cannons. I did not mean the side armour of an ifv like the warrior could take a hit from an atgm that could hole an abrams. Btw this is the book, Foss, Christopher & Sarson, Peter. Warrior Mechanised Combat Vehicle 1987 - 1994, Osprey UK, 1994, London, New Vanguard Series No. 10.

Im of course no expert but im not sure a 30mm would be to hot for an ifv. a 30mm apfsds cant be any more powerful than a 120mm heat round and the warrior is supposed to able to take a hit from that (not without some damage of course). I qualify that on info gained from the osprey book on the warrior, where a couple of friendly fire incidents are mentioned, apparntly the side hull with the add on armour(not the plain vehicle but with all the add on stuff) took a hit without the warrior being destroyed. But i think your right, i doubt an ifv could take the latest atgm's other wise there wouldnt be the development of elctro armour and so on.

www.mobytube.net (there is a good video player on the website and), but i think the plugin is i.e only. www.tinytube.net this site is not so good but its a decent backup if the above doesnt work.

Whats a poorboy? But i concur sandwichs are good!!!! mmmm my favourite is tomato puree instead of butter or mayo(i guess thats a little weird, i have to home make them) fried Bacon (smoked is best i find) Fried egg, and fried onions(usualy fried with sunflower oil but sometimes i use olive or ground nut).

depends on how they have hacked you, they might just have your ip address, which if your isp use dhcp you can request a new one. If you have adsl or something similar you will need to plug the rj45 straight into the socket, go to run in the start menu >> type cmd >> ipconfig /release >> then type ipconfig /renew. This will get you a new dchp lease. But that will only work if they havnt put anything like sub 7 on your pc.

well you have more willpower than i do. i need chips with everything! and pudding, oh and believe me coffee is a daily requirement! i like the bit about more meat! mmmmmm meat.

I think willpower is the key in this situation, something i have a lack of to and besides i only heard about the results from tv so i cant attest to it being accurate. I just thought it would be ironic if they were worse for you than the regular versions.

True but it depends who funded the studys, and of course rats arnt humans so that doesnt always mean much. Besides there is still the issue with the sweetners increasing the bodys craving for sugar which effects later sugar intake. The latest study i read claimed that people were better of in the long run drinking full sugar soda than diet for the aforementioned reasons. Either way isnt wasnt me that conducted the study so i dont know either way lol

True but then there's the issue about the chemicals possibly causing brain damage etc.

Well the argument is that the sweetners have an effect on the human body for a start and can cause harm to the body, plus they cause the body to "go in search" for sugar. The sweetners fool the body into thinking there is sugar but when it doesnt find any the body doesnt stop there, it will instead take in more sugar from anything else you eat within a certain period of time. And it will infact increase your craving for sugar. Thats the theory but im not a scientist so i can only rely on what i have read, this article is interesting http://www.mcmanweb.com/article-110.htm.

Tesco sell pretty good pizza's for 4-50 (for 2 pizza's) and there better than some places i have had pizza(in the uk and us).

Apaarently diet soda's can actualy be worse for you than the "real thing"

Well he realy cant blame labour soley, the decapitation of the armed forces is something both parties are guilty of. The only difference now is the Airforce and the army are getting the new toys and the navy is taking it up the arse, as opposed to the army taking it up the arse.