seahawk

Actually with no power a oil or gas heating also fails, as the control unit shuts down.

The South will only be controlled territories without citizen rights or any legal rights.

All of America will be part of the USA https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trump-51st-state-again-1.7647268

Canada should also be a part of the USA.

I do not see the Republicans changing course, because either the people are fed up with Trump and MAGA in the next election, then imho the Democrats win, or MAGA turns out to be a blessing and the US prospers and becomes a great country again. Then MAGA will stay and a new president will need Trump's blessing and Trump will still dictate the course of the party. At the moment it looks like the second outcome is likely, as Trump is doing very good.

I am not sure we will see the Democrats win.

I would work with the assumption that America first will be the new standard.

Some call these countries allies, others call them free loaders. In the end they will be what is best for US internal consumption. I would recommend to get used to the idea, that the US will continue to look after US interests first, as they should. And defending Europe or paying for European socialism is not in the interest of US voters. The EU is just another economic competitor that needs to be crushed and Europeans need to accept US dominance.

Los Malvinas son estadounidenses. El Reino Unido debe aceptar un acuerdo.

Nobody gives a f*ck about European feelings, what matters are US interests and the US needs Greenland as a source of raw materials and to keep Greenland from falling into Chinese hands.

For the US ending NATO would be net positive. I dare say it is even better to make a deal with Russia and divide up Europe.

That should reduce Zionst influence and make it easier to identify hostile agents.

With the appropriate warhead that thing is a killer. I would not recommend for NATO to try it, would be unfortunate if something bad should happen to Berlin, Paris or London...

But actually buying things is important for the availability rates of the fleets. So imho the most important thing is to clearly differentiate between the development and the actual purchase of systems. In a budget you should not be allowed to move money between the two different spending categories. Even if the worst case happens and you still have to take a smaller number of the old systems while already getting the firsts of the new systems, in you overall fleet you will still have frames that need replacement or for which an early retirement saves you a modernisation or SLEP. Your mission ready rates will be better.

But the ICE produces CO2 which hurts people and the planet... (leftist playbook 101)